<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jason Baxter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonbaxter.net/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonbaxter.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:56:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Panoramic Stitching &amp; HDR?&#8230; by JBaxter</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbaxter.net/index.php/2011/the-blogging-bit/panoramic-stitching-hdr-give-me-a-break/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>JBaxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbaxter.net/?p=1405#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Proper panoramas are defined by your own view. Mine just happens to be well practised &amp; more original, (in my view) which is for me the best way. I prefer to not rely to much on digital imaging techniques. I&#039;ve taken the time, money, effort to define my own way, so i can be bold enough to say what i say, even if it grates.
My results speak for themselves, my orginal pieces have massive long term impact, and can be proven to be so - so i&#039;m happy with &#039;my life&#039; thank you for asking.
Now i&#039;m always willing to learn &amp; take in alternative points of view, if i&#039;m wrong then i&#039;m to accept it - but when it appears to me digital techniques are being used more and more to cheapen my own efforts, sure i&#039;m going to reel against it.
Some people agree, some do not, but thats life..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proper panoramas are defined by your own view. Mine just happens to be well practised &#038; more original, (in my view) which is for me the best way. I prefer to not rely to much on digital imaging techniques. I&#8217;ve taken the time, money, effort to define my own way, so i can be bold enough to say what i say, even if it grates.<br />
My results speak for themselves, my orginal pieces have massive long term impact, and can be proven to be so &#8211; so i&#8217;m happy with &#8216;my life&#8217; thank you for asking.<br />
Now i&#8217;m always willing to learn &#038; take in alternative points of view, if i&#8217;m wrong then i&#8217;m to accept it &#8211; but when it appears to me digital techniques are being used more and more to cheapen my own efforts, sure i&#8217;m going to reel against it.<br />
Some people agree, some do not, but thats life..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Panoramic Stitching &amp; HDR?&#8230; by JBaxter</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbaxter.net/index.php/2011/the-blogging-bit/panoramic-stitching-hdr-give-me-a-break/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>JBaxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbaxter.net/?p=1405#comment-277</guid>
		<description>HDR - it&#039;s just not to my taste, and it is about personal vision at the end of the day. I just believe it&#039;s a passing fad, i have read about; but surely spending more time in the &#039;post&#039; production rather than taking a more orginal picture would be best?. HDR is more about how you want your vision to appear, just not me.
I can be arrogant enough to make this overall statement; i&#039;ve worked bloody hard at what i do, made umpteen sacrifices in my life (if you knew me personally then you would understand) i&#039;ve even won awards and been recognised for the impact of the work i do. My acheivements bear me out.
I stand by my statement that the more orginal the picture the more unique the final result. I have nothing against digital processing, i just prefer to minimise the use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HDR &#8211; it&#8217;s just not to my taste, and it is about personal vision at the end of the day. I just believe it&#8217;s a passing fad, i have read about; but surely spending more time in the &#8216;post&#8217; production rather than taking a more orginal picture would be best?. HDR is more about how you want your vision to appear, just not me.<br />
I can be arrogant enough to make this overall statement; i&#8217;ve worked bloody hard at what i do, made umpteen sacrifices in my life (if you knew me personally then you would understand) i&#8217;ve even won awards and been recognised for the impact of the work i do. My acheivements bear me out.<br />
I stand by my statement that the more orginal the picture the more unique the final result. I have nothing against digital processing, i just prefer to minimise the use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landscape Photography &#8211; Why do Rocks go &#8216;Moo&#8217; in the dark? by JBaxter</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbaxter.net/index.php/2010/the-blogging-bit/landscape-photography-why-do-rocks-go-moo-in-the-dark/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>JBaxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbaxter.net/?p=889#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Good to catch up - will hold you to coming along for an early morning winter shoot up Broad Law! :) JB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to catch up &#8211; will hold you to coming along for an early morning winter shoot up Broad Law! <img src='http://www.jasonbaxter.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  JB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landscape Photography &#8211; Why do Rocks go &#8216;Moo&#8217; in the dark? by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbaxter.net/index.php/2010/the-blogging-bit/landscape-photography-why-do-rocks-go-moo-in-the-dark/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbaxter.net/?p=889#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Hey Jason

Enjoyed the beers last night and great blog. Site is looking good.

Catch up again soon.

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jason</p>
<p>Enjoyed the beers last night and great blog. Site is looking good.</p>
<p>Catch up again soon.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

